
This is part of a series of patient-facing posts translating what was discussed at the American Psychiatric Association's 2026 Annual Meeting.
The presenting researcher was Carolyn Rodriguez, MD, PhD — Director of the Stanford OCD Research Lab and Professor of Psychiatry at Stanford. She has been the leading voice on ketamine for OCD for over a decade. Her 2011 case report and 2013 randomized trial established the initial evidence base for this indication.
The data she presented at APA 2026 is from a larger NIH-funded follow-up study (R01 MH105461) that has not yet been published. Conference presentations of unpublished data are common when researchers want to share findings while the manuscript is in peer review. You're reading about this weeks or months before it appears in any journal.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder affects roughly 2-3% of adults in the U.S. It's characterized by intrusive, unwanted thoughts (obsessions) and repetitive behaviors that the person feels driven to perform (compulsions).
The standard treatments:
For the patients in between — too symptomatic to be helped by SRIs alone, but not severe enough to warrant DBS — options are limited. This is the gap Rodriguez has been working to fill.
Design:
Why midazolam as the comparison drug? Because researchers needed something that would also produce a feeling of being sedated, to control for the possibility that patients improved just because they expected to or because they felt something. This is a much stronger comparison than just using saline (saltwater).
Who was in the trial:
This last point is important: this wasn't a "depression with OCD symptoms" study. These were people whose primary problem was OCD.
Treatment background: about 7 in 10 patients had previously failed at least one SRI. About 4 in 10 had completed CBT with ERP. These were not first-line patients — they were people for whom the standard playbook hadn't worked.
OCD severity is measured on the Y-BOCS (Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale), which runs from 0 to 40. Severe OCD typically scores 24 or higher; moderate is in the high teens.
| Time point | Ketamine group | Comparison (midazolam) group |
|---|---|---|
| Before infusion | 26 (severe) | 26 (severe) |
| Day 1 after | 14 (mild) | 22 (still severe) |
| Week 1 | 17 | 24 |
| Week 2 | 19 | 25 |
| Week 3 | 21 | 25 |
| Week 4 | 22 | 24 |
Translating into everyday language:
The "responder" rate — the proportion of patients whose OCD severity dropped by at least 35% — was:
| Time | Ketamine | Comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | 55% | 20% |
| Week 1 | 53% | 14% |
| Week 2 | 50% | 14% |
| Week 3 | 29% | 7% |
| Week 4 | 27% | 7% |
The differences at Weeks 1, 2, and 3 were all statistically significant. The benefit is real, the comparison group ruled out simple expectation effects, and the methodology met modern standards for a controlled trial.
In Rodriguez's earlier studies, the qualitative reports from responders have been striking. Several quotes that have circulated in the field:
"I feel as if the weight of OCD has been lifted. I want to feel this way forever."
"I tried to have OCD thoughts but I couldn't."
"I don't have any intrusive thoughts. I was laughing when you couldn't find the key, which normally is a trigger for me. This is amazing, unbelievable. This is right out of a movie."
"I feel like someone is giving me an explanation for my OCD."
These aren't typical research-paper language. They're the language of someone discovering a different mental state is possible.
Rodriguez was direct about three things:
86.6% of patients in the ketamine group correctly guessed they had received ketamine (versus 73.3% of the midazolam group). The brief dissociative experience that comes with ketamine is hard to disguise.
Researchers debate whether this counts as a fatal flaw or a manageable limitation. Rodriguez's position — and one I share — is that the effect size is too large to be explained by expectation alone. A patient who expects to improve doesn't typically drop 12 points on a clinician-rated severity scale within 24 hours.
A single dose produced 1-3 weeks of meaningful improvement, but the benefit declined over 4 weeks. This isn't a cure; it's a window. The clinical question becomes: how do you maintain the benefit?
Several models are being studied:
Dissociation during the infusion (peaking at about 30 minutes and resolved by 2 hours). No serious adverse events. Standard ketamine side effect profile.
If you have OCD and you've been frustrated with your current treatment:
This is one of the conditions where the evidence base is moving fastest. Rodriguez's data, even before publication, will reshape how clinicians think about OCD treatment.
Rodriguez also briefly touched on MDMA-assisted therapy for OCD — much earlier in the research timeline than ketamine. The hypothesis: that MDMA's effects on emotional processing might help patients engage more productively with exposure-response prevention work. A few small trials are running. No definitive data yet. But it's a thread to watch.
Ketamine treatment for OCD is not FDA-approved, but is increasingly offered off-label by interventional psychiatry programs. The practical landscape:
The most useful conversation is with a physician who can review your specific OCD history, prior treatments, and severity. If you're in a state where Isha operates, an initial consultation can determine whether at-home oral ketamine is a reasonable next step for your situation.
Considering ketamine therapy? Isha Health offers physician-led at-home treatment with an 88.8% improvement rate. Check appointment availability.
88.8% of Isha Health patients with moderate-to-severe depression show measurable improvement
Based on 546 patients and 1,900+ validated assessments. See our clinical outcomes →
Stay informed on ketamine therapy
Research updates, clinical insights, and mental health resources — delivered to your inbox.